© 2024 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY · WNPR
WPKT · WRLI-FM · WEDW-FM · Public Files Contact
ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Conn. Lawmakers, Health Experts Call For Stricter Limits On Heavy Metals In Baby Foods

ronb359
/
Creative Commons

A recent report that showed the presence of varying amounts of toxic heavy metals in baby foods has caused Connecticut lawmakers and public health experts to call for better safety standards from federal agencies in order to limit long-term risks to children.

Researchers at Healthy Babies Bright Futures, a national nonprofit alliance, tested 168 baby foods from 61 brands. They found that 95% of tested products contained chemicals and metals like lead, arsenic, mercury and cadmium -- elements that can affect brain development.

Experts said they want the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to adopt stricter limits and guidelines in order to reduce heavy-metal intake by infants.

Research has linked repeated exposure to even low levels of heavy metals to neuro-developmental issues in children.

“These may negatively impact infants’ brain development and IQ and lead to other health concerns,” said Patricia Esposito, clinical nutrition manager at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center.

Toxic metals in baby foods isn’t a new issue. Public health experts said documentation spans several decades, and that has led to some changes in food regulation and nutrition guidelines for children and pregnant women.

But Anne Hulick, a registered nurse and director of the Connecticut Clean Water Action, said the federal government has not done enough, and more progress should have been made by now.

“Our FDA has failed to set more health protective standards, and this is frightening for parents and for health professionals,” she said. “It should not be incumbent on parents to be worrying about this [with] all of the things they have to worry about.”

The Healthy Babies Bright Futures study found that rice-based foods in particular, like puffs, cereals and teething biscuits, were more likely than other foods to contain arsenic, which is naturally occurring in rice. Some baby food samples contained arsenic levels in excess of the FDA’s threshold of 100 parts per billion.

Other high-risk foods for heavy metals include carrots, sweet potatoes and fruit juices.

The FDA states that metals at high levels can be toxic, but eliminating them entirely from the food supply is not always possible because they exist in the air, water and soil. The agency’s Toxic Elements Working Group monitors levels in food and works to reduce exposure, especially among vulnerable populations like infants.

The American Academy of Pediatrics hasn’t recommended bans on these types of infant foods, but in the past, it has supported efforts to lower federal limits on heavy metals. The organization has also recommended that parents feed their children a variety of vegetables and consider alternatives like oat, grain and multigrain cereals, which contain lower amounts of arsenic.

But the authors of the Healthy Babies Bright Futures study and some lawmakers, including U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, want the federal government to do more. The study recommended that the FDA set metal limits for baby food products that don’t yet have them and lower most existing safety limits.

“At the end of the day, FDA inaction combined with toxic metals makes for an absolutely horrendous recipe in baby food,” Blumenthal said Monday in Hartford.

Blumenthal said he would take legislative steps in the absence of FDA action in order to address existing issues. 

Nicole Leonard joined Connecticut Public Radio to cover health care after several years of reporting for newspapers. In her native state of New Jersey, she covered medical and behavioral health care, as well as arts and culture, for The Press of Atlantic City. Her work on stories about domestic violence and childhood food insecurity won awards from the New Jersey Press Association.

Stand up for civility

This news story is funded in large part by Connecticut Public’s Members — listeners, viewers, and readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

We hope their support inspires you to donate so that we can continue telling stories that inform, educate, and inspire you and your neighbors. As a community-supported public media service, Connecticut Public has relied on donor support for more than 50 years.

Your donation today will allow us to continue this work on your behalf. Give today at any amount and join the 50,000 members who are building a better—and more civil—Connecticut to live, work, and play.

Related Content